Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Pro Reviews

xbitlabs‘s review Edit

According to our tests, the average performance advantage of Core 2 Quad Q9300 over Core 2 Quad Q6600 is about 7%. And what is especially pleasing, you will get this performance gain absolutely for free: Core 2 Quad Q9300 will be priced officially exactly as Core 2 Quad Q6600.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Feb 08, 2008

HotHardware‘s review Edit

As our benchmark results and power consumption tests have shown, Intel’s Core 2 Quad Q9300 represents a solid upgrade over the Core 2 Quad Q6600, which we’ve come to know and love. Even though the Q9300 has a decreased cache size and only meager improvements in terms of clock speed, all in all, performance is improved, especially in video encoding tasks, and power consumption and heat production are reduced by substantial margins as well.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Apr 28, 2008

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

The Q9300 may sound relatively expensive compared to the Q6600 but it’s well worth the extra money.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jul 24, 2008

The average pro reviews rating is 9.0 / 10, based on the 3 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?