Sort:
How we do it
Want to read all the cool news? Tired of seeing the same story written over and over again, while missing some other interesting ones? Here we are, humanly agregating most great news sites to post all interesting news, but show each story only once.
Highly rated gadgets
-
9.0
Panasonic LUMIX LX100 II
-
8.0
BlackBerry Motion
-
9.1
Apple iPhone XS
-
8.5
Xiaomi Mi A2
-
10.0
FujiFilm X-T3
-
9.0
FujiFilm XF10
-
9.0
Sony WH-1000XM3
-
10.0
Nikon Z 7
-
9.1
Apple iPhone XS Max
Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS and 110 HS target your pocket
Like UnlikeFiled in: CamerasCanonPowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Canon’s new G1 X isn’t the company’s only fresh PowerShot; there are also two new ELPH point-and-shoots, the 520 HS and 110 HS, each with sub-$300 price tags. The ELPH 520 HS totes a 10.1-megapixel high-sensitivity CMOS and a 12x optical zoom, while the ELPH 110 HS has a 16-megapixel sensor and a smaller, 5x optical zoom.
The 520 HS supports ISO up to 3200 and 28mm wide-angle shots, along with 1080p Full HD video capture and 6.8fps continuous shooting. The 110 HS, meanwhile, also captures 1080p and has the 3200 ISO range, but manages 5.8fps continuous shooting. Its lens is even wider, 24mm, for fitting more into any one shot.
Comments (0) | Permalink More at: SlashGear 1 related story Add source
Canon swings by the North Pole on the way to CES, grows the ELPH family by two
Like UnlikeFiled in: CamerasCanonPowerShot ELPH 110 HS
Not taking cues from a certain other manufacturer that unveiled well over a dozen models last week, Canon is adding just two cameras to its PowerShot ELPH family, in addition to the just-announced PowerShot G1 X. The 10.1 megapixel ELPH 520 HS and 16 megapixel ELPH 110 HS both include high-sensitivity CMOS sensors, sensitivity up to ISO 3200, 1080p video capture and 3-inch LCDs. The pricier 520 HS has a 12x wide-angle (28mm) optical zoom lens and can capture burst images at 6.8 frames-per-second, while the 110HS has a 5x optical zoom lens starting at 24mm at the wide angle and can snap up to 5.8 frames per second.
Comments (0) | Permalink More at: Engadget Add additional source