Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Pro Reviews

slrgear‘s review Edit

For full-frame digital SLR or film users, the 20mm ƒ/2.8 shows off its poorer performance issues, especially for sharpness and light falloff. Whether this performance is poor however, depends on your point of view; if you're looking for a lens which isolates a centrally-located subject by means of sharpness and light falloff, the lens does it spectacularly. If you need even light distribution and even sharpness, the 20mm prime will disappoint, especially at ƒ/2.8. At other apertures, you have a better chance of getting what you need.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jul 30, 2008

photozone‘s review Edit

The Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM feels a little dated by now - less so regarding its mechanical qualities but optically it isn't really something special anymore. Most good quality zooms can match its quality by now. The fix focal lens can still convince regarding distortions and CAs. Resolution-wise it is still a good to very good lens for sure - just not more than that.
6.5 Rated at:

 

The-Digital-Picture‘s review Edit

The Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Lens fits in a nice wide angle focal length space below the ultra-common 24-something and 28-something zoom lenses. There is a noticeable FOV (field of view) difference between 20mm and 24/28mm. People often look for a prime lens for their ultra wide angle needs. Many people don't use these focal lengths with great frequency (myself included) and look to save some money by buying a non-zoom lens. Primes are often smaller, lighter, cheaper, sharper and faster than their more versatile zoom counterparts.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 16, 2007

The average pro reviews rating is 6.5 / 10, based on the 3 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?