Compare Gadgets

Vs.

Compare

Sigma DP2x Pro Reviews

Sort:

www.whatdigitalcamera.com‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The Sigma DP2X has a lot of holes in its specification and improves very little on the DP2s with regards to a feature set and specification, but if you're an enthusiast and you're willing to make sacrifices for great image quality, the DP2X could well be an advanced compact for you.

8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jul 26, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Advisor‘s review Edit Like Unlike

TheDP2x is sure to polarise opinion: the same features which will put off the vast majority are the self-same features which will make others fall in love with it. However, while true fans will put up with its generally slow response, small 2.5 inch screen, weak built-in flash and almost pointless movie mode there’s no denying that there’s considerable room for improvement.

7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Nov 16, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Pro‘s review Edit Like Unlike

With little changed compared to its predecessor, Sigma's luxury compact is looking increasingly behind the times.

5.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jul 12, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

PhotographyBLOG‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The speed of the DP2x has been improved thanks to the improved AF algorithim, but don't expect a quantum leap in performance from the previous DP2. The DP2x is still not well-suited to quick moving subjects, with a slower and more considered approach required to get the best from it. The full retail price of £619 / $699 is an awful lot to pay for a compact camera, with the DP2x costing the same as a mid-range DSLR camera with kit lens or a comparably-sized compact system camera. So although the Sigma DP2x improves on the previous generation, there are now far too many more verastile and simply better alternatives to recommend it more strongly.

7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jul 01, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

ephotozine‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The Sigma DP2x is a quirky camera that becomes a pleasure to use once we have familiarised ourselves. It still needs further development in terms of speed and image quality, particularly in relation to its relatively poor JPEGs and its tendency to a magenta cast. It is pocketable and operationally effective. More work on some of the details would be most helpful and make for an attractive package.

7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 20, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

The average pro reviews rating is 6.8 / 10, based on the 5 reviews.

How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?

Add pro review

Copyright © 2010-24 Meet Gadget. All rights reserved.

Site features

About us

Affiliates: