Home›Gadgets›Portable Media Players›Philips›GoGear Spark SA2940›Professional reviews
Compare Gadgets
Vs.
Compare

Philips GoGear Spark SA2940 Pro Reviews

Sort:
Date

www.whathifi.com‘s review Edit

There’s an impressive amount of bass weight on offer and detail levels are amiable, but refinement and subtlety aren’t especially high on the agenda.
6.0 Rated at:

 
Was this review helpful? Yes No

reghardware‘s review Edit

The Spark is Philips most convincing portable music player for quite some time. The sound is above par for the price bracket, the battery life is excellent and the device itself is easy and pleasant to use. If you're looking for a decent MP3 player for around £50 and aren't worried by a lack of Flac or Ogg support then you could do a lot worse.
7.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Mar 19, 2009
Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Advisor‘s review Edit

The Philips GoGear Spark is principally let down by an occasionally confusing navigation system. But it is very portable and attractive, and temptingly priced for an MP3 player that includes a colour screen.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Apr 09, 2009
Was this review helpful? Yes No

CNET Reviews‘s review Edit

In the world of budget MP3 players, the Philips GoGear Spark is a diamond in the rough, offering an attractive balance of features, style, and usability.
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Feb 04, 2009
Was this review helpful? Yes No

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

A convincing challenger for the Sansa Clip, and one that works hard to produce decent results from budget headphones. However, neither audio quality nor value is quite good enough to bring down Sandisk's bargain-basement champ.
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Mar 29, 2009
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Pocket-lint‘s review Edit

We weren’t so keen on the smaller GoGear players in the past, but we are pleased to say that things have improved overall in these players whilst the price is still under control. The GoGear Spark comes in three capacities, 2GB, 4GB and 8GB, with the option of a radio, which will add £5 to the price.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Mar 12, 2009
Was this review helpful? Yes No

The average pro reviews rating is 7.2 / 10, based on the 6 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?


POPULAR COMPARISONS

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Apple iPhone X vs

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Apple iPhone X

Nikon D850 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs

Nikon D850 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Apple iPad 9.7-inch (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 vs

Apple iPad 9.7-inch (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3

Apple MacBook Air (13-in, 2017) vs Google Pixelbook vs

Apple MacBook Air (13-in, 2017) vs Google Pixelbook

Highly rated gadgets

Latest user reviews

Last of its kind

8.5 / 10

Created by Sorgo in Samsung Galaxy S Relay 4G

LG BD550 Blu-Ray Player

8.9 / 10

Created by Huntnsouls in LG BD550

Roccat Isku

8.3 / 10

Created by Huntnsouls in Roccat Isku

Copyright © 2010-24 Meet Gadget. All rights reserved.

Site features

About us

Affiliates: