Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

Nikon Coolpix S560 Pro Reviews

expertreviews‘s review Edit

The S560's automatic exposures proved very reliable in our tests, with light metering, face detection and other technologies doing an excellent job in a variety of lighting conditions. However, the S560 is constrained by the limitations of its hardware. Creating a great image using 10 million pixels on a sensor the size of a fingernail is a tough task. The S560 is far from awful, but there are plenty of better cameras at this price.
6.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Feb 25, 2009

DigitalCameraReview‘s review Edit

The S560 may have come on the market relatively quickly after its predecessor, but my time with the camera has proven it to be a solid performer. Image quality and color are very good, focus acquisition time is good, and shutter lag times are very good; ISO performance is on a par with virtually all the competition. Nikon has set up the S560 for the user who doesn't want to be overly involved with image capturing – there are some user-defined settings available in certain shooting modes, but the camera lacks true manual controls and no one will mistake it for anything but the auto shooter that it is.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jan 31, 2009

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

Although it isn’t without a couple of niggling faults, the Nikon CoolPIx S560 is a very pleasing camera to use. It has excellent handling, superior build quality, good performance and image quality, and is small, light and robust enough to take anywhere. Where it really shines though is in its outstanding high-ISO picture quality. For £160 it is excellent value for money.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Oct 15, 2008

The average pro reviews rating is 7.5 / 10, based on the 3 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?