Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

Samsung C6625 Pro Reviews

reghardware‘s review Edit

Call quality was fine. Samsung rates the battery life as 8 hours GSM talk, 500 hours GSM standby. We got about three days from it between charges, though if you are heavy on the built-in Bluetooth, GPS or HSDPA you should budget for more frequent charging. Yet all told, there’s nothing here that makes the Samsung GT-C6625 stand out from the crowd. Even so, this is a solidly built smartphone with an excellent Qwerty keyboard and GPS to boot.
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Oct 14, 2009

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

We like the C6625's slim and light design, good battery life and attractive price tag, however the handset is somewhat marred by its poor camera and the lack of Wi-Fi, the latter of which may be a deal breaker for many. The biggest issue, however, is that while the C6625 comes across as a perfectly decent phone, it definitely lacks the flair and wow factor of similar devices like the Blackberry Curve 8900 and HTC Snap. If your budget is tight it's still worthy of consideration, but if you've got a bit more cash to spend then we'd recommend you consider the other two handsets first.
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Sep 24, 2009

PC Pro‘s review Edit

Not particularly glamorous, but this is a small, light and usable smartphone which comes with attractive pricing plans for small businesses.Equipping a small business with mobile phones can be expensive, especially if you go around adding single contracts ad hoc. The most efficient choice is to go for a one-network deal - then costs come down as you add more handsets...
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Apr 28, 2009

The average pro reviews rating is 7.0 / 10, based on the 3 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?