Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

AMD Athlon X2 4800+ Pro Reviews

HEXUS‘s review Edit

The key things to take from today's look at the 4800+ is that it's generally no slower, but generally no faster either, than an FX-53 in single-threaded tests, yet it'll cost you a fair bit more. I hope it's obvious that a dual-core processors benefits lie elsewhere, with multi-threaded applications and real-world operating system usage.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 09, 2005

xbitlabs‘s review Edit

The new 65nm Brisbane core can’t provoke a revolution on the CPU market. From an ordinary user’s point of view, the processors based on the new core differ but little from their predecessors. The new core doesn’t feature any improvements on the micro-architecture level and its frequency potential doesn’t differ much from that of the older Windsor core.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jan 03, 2007

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

There’s no doubt that the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is very impressive indeed. Combined with the nForce4 SLI chipset it has performance that is truly staggering, and the only possible source of disappointment is the price.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 09, 2005

How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?