Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

AMD Athlon II X4 630 Pro Reviews

www.pcper.com‘s review Edit

The Athlon II X4 is not going to blow socks off, and it will not cause a revolution in the computer industry. What will do is provide a very modestly priced quad core system with good performance across most applications. The closest answer Intel has at this time is the Q8200, and it is around $27 more expensive, and performs about 5% slower than the X4 630.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Sep 15, 2009

HardwareZone‘s review Edit

Compared to Intel's cheapest quad-core, the Q8200, we found the two Athlon II X4s to be very competitive, especially when it comes to the more intensive video and 3D applications that one usually recommends a quad-core processor for. Not only do they get the nod from us for its performance and price, their idle power draw is commendable; although full-load power draw have room for improvement yet.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Dec 05, 2009

computershopper‘s review Edit

The Athlon II X4 630 offers a notable performance boost over the entry-level 620 for just a few dollars more, making it an excellent option for bargain hunters trying not to compromise performance.
8.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Sep, 2009

The average pro reviews rating is 8.2 / 10, based on the 3 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?