Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

LG 42LW650T Pro Reviews

www.whathifi.com‘s review Edit

We've already tested the budget £475 LG 42PW450T, but this much pricier model has a superior spec with a Full HD 1920 x 1080 resolution, for starters, and passive-3D capability (a technology which LG insists is superior to the active-shutter system its 42PW450T utilises). When we tested the 3D 47in 650T variant in our May 2011 issue, we found it to be hugely competent – if subject to dizzying price variations. Pricing on the 42LW650T seems a bit more stable. It’s certainly an attractive enough showroom proposition, slim and, thanks to that narrow-ish bezel, vaguely stylish.
10.0 Rated at:

 

AVForums‘s review Edit

When it comes to 3D LCD TVs, LG are actively passive in their approach; that's to say they're backing their Cinema 3D approach of achieving the effect through a combination of a polarised screen and glasses. Steve Withers certainly found plenty to like in his recent look at the LW550T and with just the addition of a slightly souped up motion interpolation system, in the LW650T, we're expecting good things here too.
8.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Jul 27, 2011

reghardware‘s review Edit


There’s no doubt that LG’s passive attack throws a different light on the 3D TV revolution. Using almost disposable 3D specs certainly has its appeal and it’s debatable whether there’s enough material available in 3D to make passive’s image quality drop much of an issue. As a regular 2D TV, the 42 LW650T is a reasonable mid-range option. Once calibrated, its images are perfectly acceptable and LG’s ‘net connected Smart TV hub is definitely a step in the right direction.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
May 14, 2011

The average pro reviews rating is 8.8 / 10, based on the 3 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?