Compare Gadgets

Vs.

Compare

GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD4 (rev. 1.0) Pro Reviews

Sort:

pcstats‘s review Edit Like Unlike

To sum up, in spite of the scary recall that affected the first crop of Intel P67 motherboards, Gigabyte's GA-P67A-UD4 motherboard holds up in the benchmarks with the best Intel P67 and Intel Z68 boards have to offer. Feature wise, the Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD4 is well equipped for a mainstream platform and competitively priced.

7.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Aug 16, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

bjorn3d‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The GIGABYTE P67A-UD4 motherboard has about the same amount of performance as any other motherboard on the market right now, but what matters the most are its features and whether they will be enough for an average user. The overall motherboard has a very clean and high-quality design just like the GIGABYTE P67A-UD7 did, though we were dissapointed with the push-pin design heatsinks on this motherboard. It would have been a much sturdier design if the motherboard had screws instead of pushpin design heatsinks. How much extra would have 6 more screws cost? Probably not even $2.

7.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Jan 05, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

www.pcper.com‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Some of the high points included the redesigned PCB with the new low-profile heatsinks and black color scheme. But, the low points involved sub-par gaming benchmark scores and fair overclocking results. We were also a bit disappointed with the lack of a full EFI BIOS with mouse support. Overall, after Intel's debacle with the P67 chipset is straightened out, I think Intel's new CPUs and chipset have plenty of room to mature and I hope Intel and Gigabyte can give overclockers a little more to work with other than increasing the CPU multiplier and Vcore on unlocked K-series processors.

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Feb 16, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

hardocp‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The Gigabyte P67A-UD4 is a very good motherboard but it is lacking in the newer BIOS and software overclocking features you can find on other motherboards. The BIOS is somewhat glitchy and a bit much to use. Even without all the bells and whistles, this ~$189 motherboard overclocked our 2600K processor to a solid 4.8GHz like we have seen on all other motherboards that we have tested. (Amazon, Newegg, TigerDirect) Given these facts, I think the board should be priced a bit less expensive. And it is worth mentioning, that Gigabyte is now making motherboards that you would not be ashamed of putting in a chassis with a window. In terms of aesthetics, we really like the new look Gigabyte is going with.

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jan 27, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

tweaktown‘s review Edit Like Unlike

I was not exactly sure what to think of the P67A-UD4. Where it stands in the market is just under the top end P67A-UD7. However, it is something of an anomaly. While it did not perform all that well in our common computing testing, it certainly excelled at gaming. The thing that makes this even odder is that it only uses the PCIe controller from the CPU to control the video line. The rest of the package is nice and clean with good supporting software. GIGABYTE really is moving into their own with the last few products. We can see this in the level of thought and manufacturing effort put into both the P67A-UD4 and the P67A-UD7.

8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Mar 09, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

www.legitreviews.com‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The GIGABYTE P67A-UD4 proved to be another great motherboard from GIGABYTE! We saw performance numbers throughout our testing that impressed us! Given the overall performance of the GIGABYTE P67A-UD4 I would easily recommend it. If you are going to be in the market for an Intel P67 "Sandy Bridge" platform, the GIGABYTE P67A-UD4 should be on your short list of motherboards to choose from!

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Mar 02, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

AnandTech‘s review Edit Like Unlike

After playing with both boards, I can only come to one conclusion – if it were my money, I would take the ASUS P8P67 Pro over the Gigabyte P67A-UD4. With the ASUS board, you are getting a detailed UEFI, an awesome auto-overclocking tool, better energy saving features, a USB 3.0 bracket , more SATA 6 Gb/s ports, Intel gigabit Ethernet, and in my case, scope for a better overclock. The Gigabyte board is essentially expensive for what is on offer, in terms of usability, features, and extras. This then leads into the following question – ‘if I’d rather take a $150 board rather than a $190 board, why are there $300 boards available?’

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jan 20, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Pro‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The GA-P67A-UD4 isn’t a bad board, but it offers nothing truly outstanding and the price feels a touch over the odds. With a wave of P67 boards set to crash into the market in coming weeks, we’d wait and see what rivals have to offer before taking the plunge.

6.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Jan 17, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes No

hardwaresecrets‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The Gigabyte P67A-UD4 will be a good option for users looking for a high-quality mid-range socket 1155 motherboard. The high-quality of this motherboard can be clearly seen on its high-end voltage regulator circuit and the addition of fuses on each USB port.

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Dec 10, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

The average pro reviews rating is 7.4 / 10, based on the 9 reviews.

How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?

Add pro review

Copyright © 2010-24 Meet Gadget. All rights reserved.

Site features

About us

Affiliates: