Compare Gadgets

Vs.

Compare

BIOSTAR TA890FXE Ver. 5.x Pro Reviews

Sort:

pcstats‘s review Edit Like Unlike

If you're looking for an affordable AMD 890FX-based motherboard that gives you the ability to go CrossfireX with full bandwidth, you might find the Biostar is good for meeting your immediate needs and a budget of around $155 CDN, ($150 USD, £100 GBP).

7.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Jul 14, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

hardwaresecrets‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Biostar TA890FXE is a really nice option if you are looking for a motherboard for your AMD CPU based on AMD 890FX chipset with lots of features and don’t want to sell an arm to buy one. The highlights of this motherboard includes the presence of four PCI Express x16 slots, SATA-600 ports, one eSATA-600 port, POST diagnostics display and on-board optical and coaxial SPDIF connectors. The only feature “missing” on this motherboard is USB 3.0. TA890FXE is the most inexpensive 890FX-based motherboard available on the market today, providing a terrific value to the smart user.

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 09, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

hardocp‘s review Edit Like Unlike

The BioStar TA890FXE seems to be a motherboard from 3 years ago when using its BIOS. It is not user friendly at all. It would not pass our stock clock stability tests using a 1090T processor and solid Corsair memories. It is not a great overclocker. And its ugly to look at. If you are looking for a new 890 board for your AMD processor, you would be remiss to not buy the MSI 890FXA-GD70. We found it to be a great board.

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Sep 22, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

expertreviews‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Biostar's TA890FXE has loads of features including four PCI-E x16 slots, but it's expensive and doesn't have USB3.

6.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Aug 20, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

xbitlabs‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Biostar TA890FXE is one of the simplest mainboards in this roundup. It is not primitive or limited in some way, and its functionality is similar to that of other testing participants. However, the developer just refrained from installing lots of extra controllers on it in order to make it cheaper.

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jul 29, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

The average pro reviews rating is 6.8 / 10, based on the 5 reviews.

How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?

Add pro review

Copyright © 2010-24 Meet Gadget. All rights reserved.

Site features

About us

Affiliates: