Home›Gadgets›Motherboards›ZOTAC›H55ITX-C-E›Professional reviews
Compare Gadgets
Vs.
Compare

ZOTAC H55ITX-C-E Pro Reviews

Sort:
Date

expertreviews‘s review Edit

The first Core i3/i5/i7 mini-ITX board, it's well designed for media center use but application performance isn't quite up to scratch.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Apr 09, 2010
Was this review helpful? Yes No

AnandTech‘s review Edit

Due to an innovative design, a potential for miniscule power consumption and the fact that the H55-ITX is currently the only mini-ITX motherboard on the market that supports the Core i3’s integrated graphics, the ZOTAC H55-ITX WiFi has no competition for the time being.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Feb 28, 2010
Was this review helpful? Yes No

xbitlabs‘s review Edit

Today, when chipsets incorporate nearly all necessary features, eliminating the need for lots of additional controllers, the benefits of compact form-factors, such as mini-ITX, become apparent. Zotac H55-ITX WiFi is a vivid example of how a small mainboard can be a foundation of a full-featured multifunctional modern computer if its developer wants to fully meet the requirements of a potential user.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 26, 2010
Was this review helpful? Yes No

ITreviews‘s review Edit

Generally speaking you pay a higher price for a small form factor motherboard than you do for a regular model, but when it comes to the Zotac H55-ITX WiFi the price is very reasonable. While the Zotac wouldn't make much sense for a hardcore gamer, we feel it could form the basis of a high performance PC that is small, cool and quiet.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Apr 22, 2010
Was this review helpful? Yes No

benchmarkreviews‘s review Edit

The performance of the Zotac H55ITX-C-E was very good. The motherboard proved to have nothing to ask against the competition, performing similar (sometimes faster, sometimes slower) in every benchmark test. Not everything is that good though, I had some problems when overclocking the CPU; the motherboard wasn't able to recover after a failed POST, and I had to do a clear CMOS. That wouldn't be that bad if they included a profile manager in the BIOS, but they don't. Any other feature and port performed really well, and I had no troubles to make everything run under Windows 7 OS.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Oct 12, 2010
Was this review helpful? Yes No

The average pro reviews rating is 8.5 / 10, based on the 5 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?


POPULAR COMPARISONS

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Apple iPhone X vs

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Apple iPhone X

Nikon D850 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs

Nikon D850 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Apple iPad 9.7-inch (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 vs

Apple iPad 9.7-inch (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3

Apple MacBook Air (13-in, 2017) vs Google Pixelbook vs

Apple MacBook Air (13-in, 2017) vs Google Pixelbook

Highly rated gadgets

Latest user reviews

Last of its kind

8.5 / 10

Created by Sorgo in Samsung Galaxy S Relay 4G

LG BD550 Blu-Ray Player

8.9 / 10

Created by Huntnsouls in LG BD550

Roccat Isku

8.3 / 10

Created by Huntnsouls in Roccat Isku

Copyright © 2010-24 Meet Gadget. All rights reserved.

Site features

About us

Affiliates: