Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

SHARP AQUOS LC-32FH510E Pro Reviews

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

The 32DH510E’s uninspiring on-paper spec initially makes Sharp’s 32LE210E look worth the £80 or so extra it costs, especially as the latter’s LED screen is a better performer overall. However, the simple fact is that neither screen is really anything special. So with that in mind, maybe the cheaper 32DH510E is the one to go for on simple value grounds if, say, you’re really taken with both sets’ surprising USB recording functionality. If it was us, though, we probably wouldn’t bother with either TV, and look elsewhere instead...
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Dec 16, 2010

TechRadar UK‘s review Edit

If you're in the market for a second room TV that goes big on multimedia convenience and enables you to record video without needing an external box, then the 32DH510E is almost uniquely well qualified to do the job. However, don't expect these convenience features to be accompanied by any state-of-the-art performance. In fact, while pictures have their moments, there are times when they feel quite dated in the colour and motion departments, especially with standard definition sources. And Sharp has provided next to no tools for you to attempt to improve things. Its sound is absolutely as average as that of most other budget 32in TVs in town too. In other words, it's a TV that seems to have chosen practicality over performance a little too one-sidedly for comfort. The 32DH510E might have counted as a decent effort from a B-list brand, but classes as something of a disappointment from a top-flight manufacturer.
6.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Sep 08, 2010

The average pro reviews rating is 6.5 / 10, based on the 2 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?