Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Pro Reviews

www.pcper.com‘s review Edit

The performance of the Radeon HD 2600 XT, 2600 Pro and 2400 XT was more or less a letdown. There are some strong points to the 2600 XT, 2600 Pro and 2400 XT including the integrated HDMI support, great HD video processing and lower power consumption. That might make them a great choice for an HTPC that might also play some games, but for enthusiast gamers that might also play HD movies, it's hard to recommend AMD's options over NVIDIA's.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 28, 2007

HEXUS‘s review Edit

There's a heap of promise in the Radeon HD 2400/2600 series. But that promise is concealed - and severely compromised - by the lacklustre performance and instability caused by the test drivers.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jul 01, 2007

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

Across our testing, the 2600 XT sat somewhere between the 8600 GTS and 8600 GT which, considering it is the same price as the 8600 GT makes it a great performer for the price. However it is usurped, for the recommended award, by its slightly slower sibling, the 2600 Pro.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jul 16, 2007

The average pro reviews rating is 8.0 / 10, based on the 3 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?