Home›Gadgets›Camera Lenses›Nikon›AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR›Professional reviews
Compare Gadgets
Vs.
Compare

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR Pro Reviews

Sort:
Date

www.whatdigitalcamera.com‘s review Edit

There is little to dislike about this lens and even its price, which is almost twice that of the older variable-aperture version, can clearly be justified in terms of superior optical performance and the addition of VR-II technology. There is still a place for the smaller, lighter and more affordable alternative but Nikon's new f/4 is definitely the smarter cousin and is sure to be the professional's choice
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
May 29, 2011
Was this review helpful? Yes No

slrgear‘s review Edit

Nikon's produced a nice kit lens for full-frame bodies, though it's not without its caveats. The lens fared quite well in our tests, for the most part - the big problem is the wide open performance at 70 and 85mm, where it's quite soft indeed when used at ƒ/4. If you don't need to shoot at ƒ/4 - and by and large, with VR and the high-ISO performance of modern Nikons, you might not need to - then it's not really an issue.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Nov 15, 2010
Was this review helpful? Yes No

photozone‘s review Edit

So, in summary the lens combines solid build and very attractive specifications with just okayish performance in most regards. It's the combination of specs and features, not its optical performance, that will earn this lens its buyers nonetheless, especially since there is currently no alternative that offers a similarly attractive package.
6.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Dec 25, 2010
Was this review helpful? Yes No

ephotozine‘s review Edit

By giving their 24-120mm the gold stripe treatment, adding features such as a constant f/4 aperture and Nano Crystal coatings, Nikon have made this lens a serious improvement over the older variable aperture offering. Unfortunately this has also increased the price somewhat, but those who will make the best use of this lens, who wish for a lens that delivers high resolution images over a flexible zoom range will probably not feel too hard done by after stumping up the £1045 required.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Oct 25, 2010
Was this review helpful? Yes No

The average pro reviews rating is 7.7 / 10, based on the 4 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?


POPULAR COMPARISONS

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Apple iPhone X vs

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Apple iPhone X

Nikon D850 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs

Nikon D850 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Apple iPad 9.7-inch (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 vs

Apple iPad 9.7-inch (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3

Apple MacBook Air (13-in, 2017) vs Google Pixelbook vs

Apple MacBook Air (13-in, 2017) vs Google Pixelbook

Highly rated gadgets

Latest user reviews

Last of its kind

8.5 / 10

Created by Sorgo in Samsung Galaxy S Relay 4G

LG BD550 Blu-Ray Player

8.9 / 10

Created by Huntnsouls in LG BD550

Roccat Isku

8.3 / 10

Created by Huntnsouls in Roccat Isku

Copyright © 2010-24 Meet Gadget. All rights reserved.

Site features

About us

Affiliates: