Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

AMD Sempron 3400+ Pro Reviews

phoronix‘s review Edit

The Sempron 3400+ and Athlon 64 4200+ had performed competitively when paired against the existing competition under Linux. As far as the budget-oriented Sempron 3400+, in many of the benchmarks it had only fallen marginally short of the Socket 939 Athlon 64 3000+.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 30, 2006

xbitlabs‘s review Edit

As for functionality, the Sempron 3400+ only differs from Athlon 64 processors in having a smaller L2 cache (256 kilobytes). The rest of the features and technologies implemented in Athlon 64 series CPUs are all available in the new Sempron 3400+, too.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Aug 29, 2005

Tom's Hardware‘s review Edit

Besides the 64-bit dark horse, the new chip does not really change things. The increment between Sempron 3300+ to 3400+ is only justified by a L2 cache doubling from 128 to 256 kB. As expected, the impact is fairly small. As long as the 64-bit capabilities aren't an issue for you, there is no solid reason to go for 3400+. But from a performance and price/performance point of view, an entry-level Athlon 64 based on a reasonable Socket 939 platform is still the way to go.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Aug 01, 2005

HotHardware‘s review Edit

With the release of the Sempron 3300+, AMD got a leg up on Intel, delivering the best performing budget CPU at the time. Today, the picture is not as cut-and-dried with the release of the Sempron 3400+. For one, Intel beat AMD to market with the first 64-Bit ready budget processors, delivering a complete 64-Bit budget product line with the Celeron D 351, 346, 341, 336, 331 and 328. In July, AMD updated the current Sempron line to support 64-Bit, cuminating with the introduction of the 3400+ Sempron.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Aug 01, 2005

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

Faced with tough competition from Intel, AMD has enabled 64-bit functionality and SSE3 on its entry level processors, starting with the 3400+. If this is enough for AMD to gain more market share only time will tell, but extra functionality is always welcome.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Aug 01, 2005

How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?