Compare Gadgets

Vs.

Compare

SHARP AQUOS LC-46LE821E Pro Reviews

Sort:

hdtvtest‘s review Edit Like Unlike

As it stands right now, the LC46LE821E is another Sharp display which combines some strong points with a few negatives. Sadly, the overall package is just not hugely compelling — especially given the existence of cheaper, superior alternatives.

n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 28, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit Like Unlike

If Quad Pixel technology had been developed by the likes of Sony, Samsung or Panasonic, you can bet your bottom dollar they’d be screaming about it at the top of their marketing lungs from the top of the nearest mountain. Sadly, Sharp doesn’t seem to currently lavish anywhere near as much promotional muscle on its new technology as it deserves. But do yourself a favour. If you don’t have a problem with spending £1,650 on a TV these days that doesn’t have 3D technology, book yourself an audition with the 46LE821E. You won’t be disappointed.

9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
May 11, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

TechRadar UK‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Sure, the 46LE821E isn't perfect. And yes, it's painfully expensive versus most of the 46in flat TVs that come our way these days. But by thinking outside of the (three-dimensional) box, Sharp has come up with one of those rare bits of new TV technology that's actually good enough to make you rethink your expectations of flat TV picture quality.

10.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Apr 19, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

expertreviews‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Sharp’s Quad Pixel technology is very effective, but this new found vibrancy doesn’t come cheaply. At over £1,600, the LC-46LE821E is incredibly expensive for a 46in TV without 3D capabilities. As it stands, we prefer the Panasonic Viera TX-P42G20B. It might not have the extra sub-pixel, but produces stunning colours, deep blacks and has incredibly smooth movement. With a lower price, Freeview HD and Freesat HD tuners it's the better buy.

8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 15, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

www.whathifi.com‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Is extra yellow as good as an extra dimension? Perhaps not, but that doesn’t stop the Quattron being a fine TV

8.0 Rated at:

Was this review helpful? Yes No

reghardware‘s review Edit Like Unlike

£2000 is quite steep for a 46in screen these days, so you are paying a big premium for those extra yellow pixels. As a result, the 46LE821E will probably appeal mainly to Sky HD subscribers or Blu-ray buffs who will appreciate the richness that the 46LE821E brings to HD content.

8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
May 08, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

AVForums‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Overall the LC-46LE821 has a lot going for it including excellent build quality, a reference Greyscale and very good video processing. It's just a shame that these merits have been overshadowed by marketing imperatives. The reality is, that this is an expensive display and there are others available, with similar screen sizes, and reference Greyscale and accurate colours, that cost a third of the price.

6.5 Rated at:

Published on:
May 17, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

Pocket-lint‘s review Edit Like Unlike

Overall the Sharp Aquos Quattron LC-46LE821E is a good all round performer once you wrestle control of the settings from the defaults. The array of connections should suit most users, but for a high-end set, with a price of £2000 you expect a lot, and perhaps a little more than you get.

8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Apr 30, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes No

The average pro reviews rating is 8.2 / 10, based on the 8 reviews.

How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?

Add pro review

Copyright © 2010-24 Meet Gadget. All rights reserved.

Site features

About us

Affiliates: