Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

ATI FirePro V8800 Pro Reviews

HotHardware‘s review Edit

Things are going very well for ATI these days. They are dominating the consumer market with the Radeon HD 5000 series and have now released the powerful FirePro V8800 to the professional arena. If NVIDIA doesn't hurry, we're sure to see a series of FirePro launches months before a competitive Quadro card is even announced. Indeed, the V8800 gives professionals cutting edge performance, four DisplayPort outputs, and Eyefinity support at a market competitive price point versus other cards in its class, As of today, if you're looking for the fastest graphics card for 3D animation and rendering workloads, the ATI FirePro V8800 is the answer.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Apr 07, 2010

www.pcper.com‘s review Edit

I conclude this review being very impressed with the new FirePro V8800 card from AMD especially when it is pitted against the identically priced yet slower NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 card. The inclusion of features like support for OpenGL 4.0 and DX11, not to mention support for up to four displays in an Eyefinity configuration, really do make the V8800 stand out from the crowd of professional GPUs.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Apr 07, 2010

phoronix‘s review Edit

We were already quite pleased when AMD introduced the FirePro V8700 last year and then their subsequent introduction of the FirePro V8750 that upped the memory performance a few months later. AMD then rejuvenated these workstation graphics cards last month when rolling out an enhanced driver. A simple Linux driver update caused the performance in some OpenGL benchmarks to improve by as much as 32 to 59% faster than the older software stack. With the introduction of the FirePro V8800, AMD has successfully pushed the limits of workstation graphics even further.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Apr 12, 2010

Tom's Hardware‘s review Edit

Nvidia’s Quadro 5000 is superior to AMD’s FirePro V8800 in almost every benchmark, usually by a clear margin. Based on their mainstream equivalents, we wouldn’t have expected such a great performance disparity between these two graphics boards. After all, AMD's offering is built on an excellent modern design, though it seems to have trouble living up to its performance potential in a workstation environment.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Sep 01, 2010

How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?