Compare Gadgets Vs. Compare

Pentax Pentax K-m Pro Reviews

expertreviews‘s review Edit

The K-m is not a bad camera, but it doesn't offer any advantages over the competition. For around the same price, Canon's 1000D offers better image quality, performance and features.
4.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Mar 20, 2009

DigitalCameraReview‘s review Edit

Since my day-to-day cameras are a Pentax K10D and Pentax *ist DL, I was curious how the K2000 would compare. I expected the camera to perform better than the *ist DL but fall short of the K10D. Sure enough, the K2000 performed almost exactly as expected. In short, this is one amazing little camera.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jan 17, 2009

reghardware‘s review Edit

At this price point, and with this level of performance, there’s really very little to complain about. Somehow, Pentax have put together a nice package of features at a nice price, without compromising performance to any large degree. If the K-m doesn’t force other camera manufacturers to raise their game in the entry-level DSLR sector, we’ll eat our collective hats.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Feb 06, 2009

PC Advisor‘s review Edit

Overall, despite the Pentax K2000's stellar image quality and what the company has done to make this model appealing and easy to use, it is difficult to recommend the K2000 wholeheartedly due to its focusing shortcomings. If you have an arsenal of Pentax lenses, we'd advise laying out the cash for a higher-end Pentax model. If you're looking for a more complete package of features, offerings from Canon, Nikon, and Sony scratch that itch a bit better.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Aug 28, 2009

Macworld‘s review Edit

Overall, despite the Pentax K2000’s stellar image quality and what the company has done to make this model appealing and easy to use, it is difficult to recommend the K2000 wholeheartedly due to its focusing shortcomings.
6.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Nov 23, 2009

PC Magazine‘s review Edit

Despite a few issues shooting in low light, the Pentax K2000 has great speed, solid image sharpness, and costs less than most competing D-SLRs.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Feb 27, 2009

PC Pro‘s review Edit

Simply superb value for money with very few missing features, and great image quality too
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Sep 17, 2009

Shutterbug‘s review Edit

It’s an inexpensive do-everything package that provides the entry-level D-SLR shooter with access to a system that has an extensive array of lenses and accessories and a long, fabled photographic history to boot. It’s a camera that produces great image quality, wrapped around a well-built camera with built-in special effects capability for the photographer not quite ready for Adobe’s Photoshop or even Photoshop Elements.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Nov, 2009

PC World‘s review Edit

The K2000 is a beginner-friendly DSLR with body-based stabilization, but autofocus speed and controls are drawbacks.
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Aug 26, 2009

Digital Trends‘s review Edit

In the end, we recommend the K2000 because it field tested so well. A DSLR camera will usually perform well under many conditions, and the results often depend on the photographer, not the camera. Color quality in RAW was just okay, but we loved the fast motor, the fact that the camera was rugged enough for winter shooting, and the scene modes are handy and worked well.
7.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Mar 10, 2009

Steve's Digicams‘s review Edit

The Pentax K2000 is a good transition camera for those looking to break into the world of dSLR cameras. They have made the process of switching from a point and shoot as seamless as possible and the INFO (?) button is a great first hand teaching tool for you to learn the camera. With overall good performance, very good quality and a MSRP of US$699, this is worth looking into if you are looking for your first dSLR.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Feb 11, 2009

DP Review‘s review Edit

And so, despite scoring well in virtually all areas, on balance the K2000 is a difficult camera to wholeheartedly recommend, certainly in the face of such stiff competition. The fact that it gets so much right makes the bits it gets wrong especially disappointing, and means our final rating ends up far more lukewarm than we'd like it to be.
6.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Jan, 2009

TechRadar UK‘s review Edit

Pentax is pitching its new SLR right at the bottom end of the market. Have corners have been cut?
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Dec 27, 2008

PhotographyBLOG‘s review Edit

The new Pentax K-m is another excellent addition to Pentax's DSLR range. Seamlessly slotting in below the K200D, it offers a simpler and more intuitive layout that will suit beginners better.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Dec 01, 2008

www.trustedreviews.com‘s review Edit

The Pentax K-m is a good first camera. It has better build quality than most of its rivals, it handles and performs well, and is capable of producing excellent results even in the hands of a novice, while still having enough features and custom options to satisfy more experienced photographers. The only real problem is the annoying lack of AF target points in the viewfinder, which is both confusing and inconvenient.
8.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Mar 30, 2009

infoSync World‘s review Edit

The Great White Whale is here! Will the Pentax K2000 fill us with fear and loathing or will this radical entry-level DSLR take us on a nice trip to Quality Heights?
8.5 Rated at:

Published on:
May 16, 2009

CNET Reviews‘s review Edit

Speedy performance lifts the Pentax K2000 above the cheap-dSLR masses, but bad default settings make it an iffy choice for newbies.
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 08, 2009

The average pro reviews rating is 7.5 / 10, based on the 17 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?