Home›Gadgets›Cell Phones›Samsung›Galaxy S III›Professional reviews
Compare Gadgets
Vs.
Compare

Samsung Galaxy S III Pro Reviews

Sort:
Date

PC Advisor‘s review Edit

The Galaxy S3 remains an excellent smartphone. It offers a good design and build quality, despite our small niggles. Samsung has put together an impressive set of hardware resulting in silky smooth performance and extensive software features. It is certainly in no way outdated in the current market.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 17, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

GSMArena‘s review Edit

As if you are only now considering purchasing one of those smartphones - the choice couldn't be easier. The Galaxy S4 is easily worth the extra cost over its predecessor and as long as you can afford it, that's the only one you should be looking at.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Apr 10, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Notebookcheck‘s review Edit

After the preceding hype of the official introduction of Samsung's Galaxy S3 (GT-I9300) at a gigantic launch event in London, positive and negative voices were heard. Contrary to expectations, the smartphone did not feature a Full HD screen or a 12 megapixel primary camera. The design barely adopted any points of its precursor and a black model is also no longer available. We found the Galaxy S3's looks pleasing and the option of replacing the battery and inserting a micro SD memory card are plus points. The polycarbonate casing is well processed but cannot compete with the unibody casing of HTC's One X or Apple's high-end materials. The plastic, aluminum-colored rim could also have been the real thing. The big 4.8 inch HD Super AMOLED screen has a resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and supplies both an excellent contrast and black value. The luminosity would have to be a bit brighter for perfect outdoor use. We could exhaustively contemplate about the PenTile matrix of the AMOLED screen compared with the SLCD2 in the One X. Without a direct comparison, this technical difference will be insignificant for most users. The performance of the Exynos 4 Quad SoC (Exynos 4412) proves to be ideal. The power is usually close to or clearly above the scores of NVidia's Tegra 3 SoC. The integrated camera modules enable shooting high-resolution pictures in good quality although the digital zoom should be avoided.
8.8 Rated at:

Published on:
Apr 12, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

OK, so the Galaxy S4 may not be a tremendous upgrade over the Galaxy S III, but it sure is a better smartphone. The new flagship excels in many areas, including its exterior design, the screen, which is now 1080p, the updated UI with latest Android version, 13 MP camera and a host of new software features. All of these feature upgrades make sure that you're having a a better experience while using the handset, not only in specific situations, but also while doing completely basic things like calling, messaging, getting notifications and so on. We gues this is why Samsung continues to get more and more influential in the smartphone market, as the company's high-end phones not only have state-of -the-art hardware, but also an increasingly better user experience, which you can never get with specs alone. But let's get back to our comparison and try to answer the question that we asked at the start – should Galaxy S III owners think about an upgrade? Well, it sure isn't a simple question, which means there isn't one ultimate answer. If you have spare money, and having the latest gear is always a top priority for you, then just go ahead, sell that aging Galaxy S III and get the GS4! In any other case, we think that the Galaxy S III is still competent enough – from hardware to software. The screen is big, the processor is fast, the experience is wonderful... plus it will probably get an update to the next version of Android, so for the time being, it looks like you won't be missing much at all, should you stick to the Galaxy S III.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Apr 08, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Advisor‘s review Edit

We're disappointed to see an almost identical design with the Galaxy S4 but at least some of the hardware upgrades are significant - the screen, processor and cameras. Once again Samsung has gone all out on software features but a lot of these might be brought to the Galaxy S3. Stay tuned for a full Galaxy S4 review soon.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Mar 26, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

Samsung's Android mojo does a disservice to the Galaxy S III with its ability to lose value slower than other brands. Granted, without carrier subsidies the Galaxy S III is roughly 20-30% cheaper than the SIM-free HTC One, but you get so much more from HTC's handset in every department, that it's probably not worth the money saved. The HTC One sports a sophisticated and head-turning design, brighter high-res display, much better sound recording and output, as well as superior low-light camera footage. Thus one of the very few reasons to pick the S III before the HTC One is if you have to have a swappable battery and a memory expansion slot, in all other cases HTC's current finest is a clear winner before Samsung's last year bestseller, as can be expected.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Mar 20, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

GSMArena‘s review Edit

When Google announced that the next Nexus will pack four Krait cores and an upgraded camera, all for the price of $300 ($350 for the more sensible, 16GB version), there was a short moment when it seemed that everyone after an Android phone would be crazy not to get a Nexus 4. It was better and cheaper than anything else out there. Then reality interjected. Users realized the limited storage would be felt sooner rather than later, even in the "big" version. The vanilla Android just isn't everyone's cup of tea, the image quality isn't quite up to par, and there are a number of other things that are not ideal (non-removable battery for one).
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Dec 21, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

Being this year's fresh spring crop, the Optimus G Pro predictably outshines last year's Samsung flagship in almost every category, with the most important being display quality and processing power. It also offers a few novel features, like a programmable QButton on the side, and a very useful IR blaster. If you want a handset that is easier to manage with one hand, though, the S III is one of the lightest and most compact big-screen phones out there, yet LG has done an excellent job at keeping the weight and dimensions of the 5.5” G Pro in check, too. The S III sports one very important advantage before the high-end G Pro, however, and it is a lower price tag, as LG's phone can currently only be imported for north of $800, so if you don't have to be on the bleeding edge of technology, it might all balance out.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Mar 08, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

It should be clear by now that you can't go wrong with either handset. Both the Sony Xperia Z and Samsung Galaxy S III are exceptional smartphones with their own pros and cons. On one hand, we have the Xperia Z with its exquisite glass design and powerful hardware, but on the other, there's the Galaxy S III that offers almost the same amount of goodies and does some things better. Being a newer device, the Xperia Z has the benefit of technological evolution, which allows it to outshine Samsung's 2012 flagship in some areas like the display. As a whole, however, the Xperia Z didn't do enough to make us see it as the ultimate victor in this struggle. The Galaxy S III managed to hold its ground without too many casualties, proving once again that its place among the smartphone elite is well-deserved.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Feb 18, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

ephotozine‘s review Edit

With an 8 megapixel sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S3 is capable of decent image quality with very good colour reproduction. With the addition of the Android operating system it is a good camera for taking pictures when out with friends or on a trip out, which can then all be edited and shared direct from the phone. With the wide-angle fixed lens, portrait shots aren't great, although you can use the digital zoom, although this reduces image quality. But where this lens will be at its best is for large group shots and landscapes. The S3 also has an impressive speed in continuous shooting - we managed 5.9 fps.
7.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Feb 15, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

Can BlackBerry do what Google did to it back in 2008? Although some might be quick to draw a foreseeable demise to BlackBerry, there’s still hope, of course, especially when Google made it on top. Needless to say, it’s funny in how some things turn out. No one said it would be easy to start fresh (again), but as long as BlackBerry can push out timely updates to enhance its new experience, there is always a light at the end of the tunnel, but then again, we all know how webOS turned out. So what device should you call your own right now? Seeing that these two are priced at $200 on-contract, it’s not all that difficult to point out the extensive set of features you’re going to get with the Samsung Galaxy S III. From the various software enhancements attached to its TouchWiz Nature UX experience, to the way Android as a whole adheres to the needs of power users, there’s a whole lot of bang for the buck put out by Sammy’s flagship. Still, if you opt to go with the BlackBerry Z10, there are some compromises that you’re going to make. It’s not perfect, obviously, but when there’s a minimum expectation, it’s hard to find valid arguments to point out the Z10’s superiority. Nevertheless, there’s always hope, hope for a better tomorrow.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Feb 07, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Advisor‘s review Edit

Even though it's considerably older, it's the Samsung Galaxy S3 which comes out on top when up against the BlackBerry Z10. The Galaxy S3 is superior in a number of areas including software and battery life.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Feb 04, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

MobileBurn‘s review Edit

Early impressions of the Z10 show that this is an excellent phone and definitely one that I would take over the competition. BlackBerry had to create something phenomenal to bounce back, and that's exactly what they did with the Z10. However, there's still room for improvement. Here are a few things that I wish the Z10 had. - Contactless charging or at least plug-less charging like the Bold 9900. This should be standard on all phones. - Netflix (I know, I know, I already talked about that). - Sugarsync, my cloud storage service of choice. I do not want to switch to Dropbox, so hopefully we'll see the app soon.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jan 31, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Advisor‘s review Edit

The Galaxy S3 is a top-notch smartphone and you'll save a bit of money compared to the Xperia Z. However, the Xperia Z looks like Sony might have got a smartphone right so look out for our full review soon.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jan 18, 2013
Was this review helpful? Yes No

GSMArena‘s review Edit

Having reviewed both the Samsung Galaxy S III and Galaxy Note II, and looking at them up close again for this article, it's still hard to pick a favorite. The Note II certainly offers more in a lot of areas we've tested but the user experience isn't dramatically different from what a Galaxy S III offers. So is it worth the extra weight in your pockets and the higher price tag? We guess it's down to what you plan on using the gadget for - the Galaxy S III feels like more of an all-in-one device. It's an excellent phone for calls, for using outdoors, for shooting photos and with a 4.8" 720p Super AMOLED display it does a great job at browsing the web or playing movies. In short, it's a great balance between portability and performance. The Galaxy Note II trades away some phone functions (not the least of which are portability and sunlight legibility) and lets the tablet side of its phablet personality come forward - a screen that's even better suited for multimedia consumption, gaming and, with features like S Pen and the split-screen UI, a higher productivity potential.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Oct 12, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

GSMArena‘s review Edit

It's up to you to go over the ones that matter to you and tally the score. And don't be swayed by popular opinion. The smartphone is probably the most personal thing you own (it knows your friends, has your photos, goes everywhere with you), so it's up to you to decide which one is best. Before you look at the price of either phone, there's one last thing to consider - how invested you are in either ecosystem already. For example, you may have iPhone accessories worth a few hundred dollars (though the iPhone 5 pretty much wiped the slate clean on this one), or maybe various apps you've bought and don't want to lose. That leads us to price and the difference is by no means negligible. SIM-free the iPhone 5 is probably the most expensive smartphone on the market right now, topping the Samsung Galaxy S III in Europe by almost 200 euros. But then, resale value is another thing you might want to look at, after all it won't be long before the next Galaxy S and iPhone generation is out, tempting you to upgrade. Of course, you can easily use the Galaxy S III and iPhone 5 for a couple of years and not feel too far behind the flagship du jour. Some would say that the most damning verdict for the iPhone 5 is that it's trading blows with a smartphone that came to the market 5 months before it, instead of wiping the floor with it. Others will point to the fact that the Galaxy S III took three months to achieve the sales numbers that the Apple flagship already has. In the end, the iPhone 5 vs. Galaxy S III argument comes down to portability vs. screen size, LCD vs. AMOLED, closed vs. open, Apple vs. Samsung. The latter have been in and out of court for a while now but this particular dispute won't be settled in a courtroom. You'll be the judge, so the winner doesn't have to be the one with the better lawyers.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Oct 25, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

GSMArena‘s review Edit

The LG Optimus G and the Samsung Galaxy S III are the best Android can currently offer. Picking between a smartphone that came to the market five months ago and one that is just arriving might have seemed easy at first, but after the somewhat surprising finding in this review, things are less clear cut. The LG Opttimus G chipset is so vastly powerful that we expected it to swim laps around the Galaxy S III Exynos, but the smartphone was obviously let down by its software support. The LG flagship managed to win on many occasions, but the differences were pretty minor. The only place where the Optimus G was able to give its competitor a real trashing was GPU performance at 1080p resolution. On the other hand, the LG Optimus G lost the web browsing performance battle, which is one of the most common applications of smartphones these days.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Oct 27, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

Depending on how much you’re willing to fork over, both handsets prove their value against one another. Considering it’s the newer kid on the block, the HTC DROID DNA’s $200 on-contract point is justified, which is especially notable for its killer specs sheet. Therefore, if money isn’t an issue, we’d recommend picking up HTC’s beast knowing it’s one smartphone that has some astounding qualities. Although it’s no longer the shiniest thing around, the Samsung Galaxy S III is a very well-rounded option that continues to be a relevant item. At the same time, you can probably snag the handset for much less than HTC’s offering, which should no doubt appeal to some people looking to save money without making any dramatic compromises with performance and features.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Dec 05, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

This might have sounded pretty strange just a year ago, but the Windows Phone 8-powered Nokia Lumia 920 is the better phone in many respects than the five months older Galaxy S III. It has the better screen, better camera, better call quality and better sound recording and playback. It also offers free offline voice-guided navigation, to solidify its uniqueness before Samsung’s handset. Still, throwing every edgy piece of technology Nokia could muster for its first true Windows Phone flagship took its toll on the chassis girth and heft, making it feel like a tank next to the slim and light Galaxy S III. Thankfully, that also affected its stellar drop durability in the positive sense, yet its body, while ergonomic to handle, seems unsightly compared to thin handsets like the S III. Furthermore, when it comes to the operating system, Windows Phone, which on the surface is fresh and easy to grasp, feels much more restricted than the freewheeling Android with all its widgets and customizations, plus the superior multitasking and natural voice commands. The app situation is also widely in favor of Android, and thankfully Nokia throws in some fine exclusive apps like Drive and Mix Radio to soothe the pain somewhat. Compared feature by feature the Galaxy S III doesn't offer many advantages before the burly, but capable Lumia 920, yet its hardware and software combo is more aligned with the smartphone trends of late, so it feels more familiar. That familiarity is exactly what Nokia has tried to escape from with the unique features of the Lumia 920, sacrificing on the compact factor in the process.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Dec 02, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

This is a tough cookie folks, since there’s plenty to like about these premier smartphones. For LG though, they can sleep at night knowing they have a venerable competitor that can share the same spotlight as Sammy’s beloved Galaxy S III. However, even though LG’s offering is the newer device between the two, while also sporting the most up-to-date version of Android, Samsung’s baby still manages to be quite a handful. More so when it’s a consistent rival that continues to be a relevant device to this day. If you’re all about balance, the Samsung Galaxy S III appears to deliver a more well rounded performance. On the flip side though, if being treated to the latest updates is your kind of thing, there’s no kidding you’ll get just that with the Nexus 4.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Nov 26, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Advisor‘s review Edit

In this world you get what you pay for, a phenomena of which smartphones are a good example. The Ace 2 is a cracking little smartphone for the price, but if your budget will stretch the to the SIII you won't regret the extra expense. Choosing between the Note II and the SIII is a little more difficult. In essence, the former is a small tablet with phone capabilities. If you require a bigger, 5in screen you'll find the Note II is the best such device on the market. It comes with a stylus too, so you can definitely be more productive and creative on it than with a standard-sized smartphone: even one with a big screen like the SIII. However, its bulk won't be for everyone, and the SIII is a truly stand out Android phone.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Nov 22, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

We believe that the Samsung Galaxy S III is the better package of the two. The handset feels better when in the hand, compared to the 8X, and offers all kinds of features, which aren't really available on the Windows Phone 8X, like a larger screen, great personalization capabilities, better QWERTY keyboard, slightly better camera, Flash Player support, and, of course, a vast application catalog. Meanwhile, the HTC's Windows Phone 8X is by no means a bad smartphone, especially considering its awesome screen, neither its design, nor the software platform are currently good enough to help it trump a fearsome opponent like the Galaxy S III.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Nov 09, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Advisor‘s review Edit

Our first impressions are that the Galaxy S3 Mini will be a book to those who find the Galaxy S3 too large and too expensive. However, at 4in in screen size, the Mini isn’t particularly small and there is a significant downgrade in specifications to bear in mind. Look out for our full Galaxy S3 Mini review.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Oct 12, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

As history tells us, Apple’s flagship will no doubt sell very healthily during its reign, even despite the horde of competition that’s always on the prowl. However, it’s coming after Samsung’s very own flagship in the Galaxy S III, which as we’ve witnessed, has proven itself to be a viable competitor in the landscape. From head to toe, there are plenty of remarkable elements that make us love both phones wholeheartedly. But when we combine all of the necessary aspects to make a device appealing to a geek's heart, like their specs, performance, wow factor, and software experience, it seems as though the Samsung Galaxy S III has the goods to stand out just a tad bit more. Even though its looks might pale in comparison to the chic styling of the iPhone 5, the Samsung Galaxy S III is able to closely match Apple’s pride and joy in many categories. Ultimately, it’s the TouchWiz Nature UX experience and its extensive set of functionality that makes the SGSIII the more productive and complete handset between the two. Meanwhile, though, the iPhone 5 remains the best device for users who just want a good-looking handset with great performance and a very easy-to-use mobile operating system.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Sep 27, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

ubergizmo‘s review Edit

It is fair to say that the Galaxy S3 is an excellent smartphone. While it is not the “revolution” that Samsung fans were waiting for, the S3 deserves its spot in the Android Hall of Fame. Its design had created some controversy, but we do like it – a lot. The curves of the phone make it very nice to manipulate and the smartphone feels surprisingly light – even if it is not actually lighter than the HTC One X – the power of design, we suppose. Samsung’s near-fanatical focus on providing genuinely useful features to the end-user deserves some kudos as well. While not every project turns out to be a blockbuster, things like S-Memo, S-Voice and TecTiles have demonstrated great potential at making a difference in one’s daily life. Finally, the quality of the camera hardware and software makes the Galaxy S3 a pleasure to use for casual photography, which is the #2 activity for smartphone users.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 20, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Engadget‘s review Edit

The best thing about the Galaxy S III? That it's more than the sum of its parts. Individually, the slightly larger and better display, stronger processor and faster camera may not sound that special, but in daily operation they score major combo points: gathering up all the best bits of the older Galaxy S II and re-working them into a solidly modern (read: mid-2012) device. The power- and storage-hungry Android user simply cannot go wrong with this purchase, and neither can those looking for a great camera.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 25, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

HotHardware‘s review Edit

Although the Galaxy S III is a high-end phone, its price tag is still quite reasonable in the current market. Pricing can vary from carrier to carrier, but you can pick up the 16GB version of this phone for just $199 (with a two-year contract). Thanks to its competitive price, excellent performance, and extra features, the Galaxy S III is a phone we would highly recommend, and that's why it earned our Editor's Choice award. Samsung has another major success on their hands with the Galaxy S III.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 20, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

TheVerge‘s review Edit

One thing that goes consistently overlooked with respect to Samsung’s phones is the company’s ignominious track record with Android software updates. There may be worse offenders out there, but Samsung’s chronic failure to update its devices on time (or at all) is a significant black mark for a brand looking to lead the way in almost every other respect. Thus, as much as I may enjoy the Galaxy S III today, I have to temper that enthusiasm with the knowledge that its long-term future may not be as rosy as that of a stock Android device or one produced by HTC. That having been said, the Galaxy S III is a technological triumph. Not at first sight, perhaps, but Samsung has done the overwhelming majority of things right. The camera is easily the best I’ve used on an Android device, the processor claims the title of benchmarking champion, and the customizations layered on top of Ice Cream Sandwich are mostly unobtrusive and sometimes even helpful. They never really gel into one coherent user experience, meaning you’ll have to learn what each new feature does individually rather than intuiting it from the phone’s general behavior, however that’s a trifling complaint when compared to our usual disappointments with Android OEM skins. TouchWiz may still have its illogicalities, but it’s been cleaned up and streamlined sufficiently to make it an adequate alternative to Google’s stock experience. While neither the display nor the construction materials on the Galaxy S III are the best possible, both represent acceptable compromises that help Samsung balance out the rest of its class-leading spec sheet.
8.5 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 20, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

pocketnow‘s review Edit

The Galaxy S III was overhyped, both by Samsung and by the media. This hype caused expectations to be sky high, but for good reason: this is Samsung’s preemptive answer to the next iPhone, the next high-end HTC, and so on. Did it deliver? If you consider the cons listed above, most of which are issues relating to software (which can be updated or changed), we have to say that no, the Galaxy S III didn’t deliver. But thanks to the beautiful design, great day-to-day performance, superb call quality, and wonderful camera, we can confidently recommend the Galaxy S III for those looking for the best smartphone experience possible.
7.3 Rated at:

 
Was this review helpful? Yes No

brighthand‘s review Edit

To call the Samsung Galaxy S III feature rich is an understatement. In fact, Samsung sent out a 48-page reviewer guide detailing them all, and I only touched on a handful in my review. I have a feeling that one year into using it, S III owners will still be discovering the cool things it can do. It's too bad then that the features are too often limited to Samsung smartphones and other S III handsets, particularly in regards to sharing content. I suppose Samsung has sold enough smartphones and will sell enough S IIIs to justify the move, but it flies in the face of Android "openness," and limiting sharing features is counterintuitive. That aside, the Samsung Galaxy S III still offers great design, excellent display, and superb performance. It's the best Android smartphone at launch for my money (I have yet to test out the HTC One X, however), and probably the best overall smartphone until the next iPhone comes around. Even then, it will be hard for Apple to top what Samsung has in the Galaxy S III.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 20, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Scoop‘s review Edit

If you haven't figured it out yet, Samsung has impressed me with the Galaxy S III. I was expecting another incremental update in terms of design and features. I was expecting a ho-hum device with little to set it apart from previous generations of devices. Instead, Samsung went for broke and packed the device with features that may lead to mass adoption of burgeoning technology such as NFC. Even if it's used only to share pictures, NFC traction has to start somewhere. Beyond the bells and whistles, the Galaxy S III is a damned good phone. It excels at nearly every feature. The hardware is the best ever from Samsung and the performance backs it up. The stunning camera and video camera are good enough to record your wedding day, and watching it over and over on the GS3's gorgeous display will make you smile from here until death you do part. Before the GSIII arrived, HTC set the bar this year with the HTC One X. The One X had a few problems, though: specifically voice quality and battery life. The GSIII bests the One X on those and every other feature at least to some degree. Samsung has raised the bar with the Galaxy S III. It will be hard for many other manufacturers to reach it, let alone vault over it. For Android fans, the Galaxy S III is the only phone worth getting. Nothing else comes close.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 19, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

GSMArena‘s review Edit

If it's just a matter of which of the two phones we'd like to have in our pocket, the answer is a straightforward "Galaxy S III, please". The S II was a trusted companion, but it no longer tickles our inner geek, while the S III feels like it comes from the future. At the checkout, we started having second thoughts - the Galaxy S II will easily remain a great phone for another year, even if not quite as good as its successor. So, if you already have it and are not too keen to spend, it will easily last you till the Galaxy S IV, which is sure to come some time next year. Things are murkier for those who don't already have a Galaxy S II though - sure, the phone is cheaper now, but is it worth spending money on a phone that already has a few gray hairs? In the long run, a Galaxy S III (if you can afford it) is the better choice - it won't have aged that much by next year (when the S II will be old and creaky) and you would have gotten to use the better smartphone of the two during that time. Also, its resale value will be higher after a year, so the cash you've spent for owning the phone might not be much more than getting an S II now only to sell it dirt cheap later on. Okay, this conclusion will shock no one - the newer phone is better and that's hardly a surprise. But the thing is, if you had to choose which one to buy just now, the S III is better by just enough to make spending the extra cash worthwhile.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 23, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

GSMArena‘s review Edit

Two superphones, one Android crown. The HTC One X managed to come to the market first, while the Galaxy S III is a little late, but has plenty to show for it. We're tempted to play it safe and split it equal. The HTC One X: this is what a droid flagship should look like. The Samsung Galaxy S III: that's what a droid flagship should perform like. But that won't be fair to either of them. They didn't get where they are by playing it safe. It seems obvious that the Samsung Galaxy S III wouldn't have raised as the new standard-setter without a powerful challenger like the One X. There's no consolation prize here, no second-best. A fair fight and a win-win for Android.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 11, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

GSMArena‘s review Edit

When Samsung announced the Galaxy S III, they saw to it that their top smartphone matched - at the very least - the best on the market. And because no effort was too much in insuring against any surprises, they ended up with something that's nearly impossible to beat. Love it or hate it, the S III is one of the top phones on the market and will stay so for quite a while. When we say "hate it", we're mostly referring to its size (though it's not much bigger than the S II) and the plastic the outer body is made of - both have their detractors. Those two aside, the Galaxy S III leaves users with no other options but be impressed - from the light, slender body, the beautiful screen, the improved camera, powerful chipset to all kinds of advanced software features (some of which are truly useful, while others are just for show). Some of the S III tricks have the potential to be trend-setters (like Smart Stay, Direct call and S Beam), others are me-too kind of add-ons (burst shot, S Voice) and some need quite a lot of work to become useful at all (S Voice springs to mind again). Still, no matter how you cut it, the Samsung Galaxy S III is a phone that all others will have to measure up to.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 20, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC World‘s review Edit

Is the Samsung Galaxy S III worth all of the hype? I think it is. The Galaxy S III has a certain appeal that makes you want to keep using it. A friend of mine noticed it on my desk, started playing with it, and couldn’t put it down. “I need this phone,” my friend declared after 5 minutes. The display is irresistible, and the quickness of the phone can’t be beat. The problem with Samsung phones is that sometimes the company goes too far in trying to stand out from the rest of the pack. Some of the Galaxy S III's features feel like gimmicks, especially the sharing ones that let you share only with other Galaxy S III phones. S Voice sort of seems like a me-too feature to compete with Apple’s Siri. Really, though, these are just extra frills. At its core, the Galaxy S III is an excellent phone, and Samsung did the right thing in making it uniform across the multiple carriers. And who knows--maybe your whole family and your entire circle of friends will buy the Galaxy S III, so those sharing features will actually be useful.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 19, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

When it comes right down to it, the HTC Rezound is clearly outdated by the new Samsung Galaxy S III, as it features a larger display, thinner body, faster processor (and more RAM), and comes with Android ICS. When you factor in the same price of $199 on-contract, the choice is clear: the Samsung Galaxy S III is the better buy.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jul 18, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

There’s a lot to like about both devices – and choosing which one is better can be a tough decision for anyone, as it is subjective on what that person is looking for. But as it stands right now, we are going with the Samsung Galaxy S III on these points: the larger and higher resolution display, faster processor with more RAM, more polished user interface, and better camera. But the Galaxy S III does lack that “premium feel” that you get from the more solid Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX, not to mention the substantial difference in the battery life.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jul 17, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

If you are not shutter-happy, the Nokia 808 PureView might be quickly put in the drawer and taken out only for occasions, going out and vacations, if you have the Samsung Galaxy S III as your daily driver. The flexibility of Android, planted in the thin and compact body with a gargantuan 4.8” Super AMOLED HD display and the addition of special features like Pop Up Play make the Samsung Galaxy S III a much better choice. About the only advantage the 808 PureView has in terms of software is the free offline voice-guided navigation of Nokia Drive that comes with it. In terms of hardware, however, despite that the silicon which powers the Galaxy S III is way ahead of what's inside Nokia's handset, we have one area where Nokia's handset has a huge advantage. The 41MP PureView camera is the best ever made for smartphones. The loudspeaker and the Rich Recording stereo audio are much better on Nokia's phone too. The sensor is so good, that a few botched party or holiday shots and videos with the Galaxy S III, where the Nokia 808 PureView would have passed with flying colors, might make you reconsider how much design and apps you actually need. If you are not the one for photos or videos, well, then the Galaxy S III will be an easy pick before the Nokia 808 PureView, especially in light of the comparable pricing.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jul 03, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

So, the big question remains: which device is better? As always we’re going to remind you that this is a subjective question, and what you value in a phone is most important to you. Are you a Sense or TouchWiz person? Do you prefer the heavier HTC, made of aluminum, or the lighter, plastic Galaxy S III with its color options? The S-LCD2 display of the EVO 4G LTE is slightly better, but Samsung’s HD Super AMOLED panel is slightly bigger and more eye-catchy. While the EVO runs better in benchmarks and real world usage, the Galaxy S III will get you double the RAM and storage along with a removable battery. Both devices are at the top of the mobile mountain right now, with blazing fast processors, gobs of memory, good cameras and tons of cool features, and no matter which you choose you’re going to have a phone that should last the next two years without any problems.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 28, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

One of the first dilemmas that everyone needs to overcome when looking at these two, it has to be which platform experience is going to be the more suitable one. For us, the TouchWiz Nature UX is light years more expansive with its arsenal of features to put the Windows Phone 7.5 Mango experience of the Nokia Lumia 900 to shame. No doubt, if money is a concern to you, the Lumia 900 is still a great option with its chic design and balanced set of features. However, if you want to experience something utterly cutting-edge, you’ll need to fork over the cash to scoop up the Samsung Galaxy S III – but trust us, you won’t regret it at all!
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 26, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

As we take a look back on how these two smartphone perform in the various categories, the Samsung Galaxy S III is the clear winner when it comes to overall performance. Specifically, it has the combinational hardware punch and comprehensive software experience to make it cross the finish line ahead of the Sony Xperia ion. However, the Sony Xperia ion’s $100 on-contract pricing still makes it a valiant offering. Therefore, if you’re on a tight budget and don’t want to settle for a mid-range spec’d device, the Xperia ion is still a valuable option for you. On the flip side, however, if you want to seriously experience the best that Android has to offer, you’ll want to stick with the Samsung Galaxy S III – even though it’s priced double than its rival at $200.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 25, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

reghardware‘s review Edit

Well, as you know, this a big handset. If the extra real estate appeals and if your digits can cope with the scale of the handset, it has an awful lot going for it, from its deeply enjoyable hi-res screen to the genuinely innovative, if occasionally gimmicky, features. A powerful chip with decent RAM, outstanding battery life and good call quality ensure that the basics are well-catered for, while the headline features will guarantee entertainment value down the pub... for a while, at least.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
May 30, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

letsgomobile‘s review Edit

T he Samsung Galaxy S3 is a real high-end Android smartphone, with Samsung’s inspired-by-nature Touch wiz interface. Thanks to the quad-core processor, the smartphone reacts very quickly, regardless of the amount of applications that you open, the Galaxy S3 never falters. The 4.8" HD Super AMOLED display is crystal clear and the phone is full of intelligent functions. The speech recognition function, or rather S Voice, is a fun addition, but clearly needs to be developed more. The 8 Megapixel camera performs better than expected. The battery has also been significantly improved. In our opinion, the Galaxy S3 is the best smartphone currently available. Once you have your hands on the phone, it is hard to put it down again; the entire smartphone experience is very good with the Samsung Galaxy S3. It has a great price / quality ratio.
9.1 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 16, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

There is a lot to love about the Samsung Galaxy S III and the LG Optimus 4X HD. Both devices come with powerful, top-end hardware, absolutely no major drawbacks, and will surely serve you well for years to come. The pros with the S III, however, seem to outnumber those of the 4X HD. Samsung's flagship has a better camera, superior in-call audio quality, and we quite like its aesthetic features. Nevertheless, keep in mind that the 720p screen on LG's pride and joy, with its neutral color representation and superior outdoor visibility, outperforms the S III's Super AMOLED HD display, at least from our point of view. Besides, the device itself feels more compact, and is therefore, a bit easier to handle.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
Jun 22, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

MobileBurn‘s review Edit

The Samsung Galaxy S III carries a lot of weight on its shoulders, and, fortunately, it is up to the task. The Galaxy S III's solid spec sheet combined with the useful software features that Samsung has added to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich make the GS3 a good choice for many smartphone shoppers. Add in the fact that the phone will be available from all of the major carriers in the U.S. and features support for the fastest data networks around, and I can easily see how many customers will make the Galaxy S III their pick when it comes time to buy their next smartphone. Some users may have trouble with the large physical size of the Galaxy S III, but many will probably enjoy the greater screen real-estate on tap and will find the size to be more than manageable. I do wish that Samsung would have opted to use some more premium materials in the phone's construction instead of its usual glossy plastics, but it's solidly put together in spite of that.
9.2 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 20, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Digital Trends‘s review Edit

The Samsung Galaxy S3 is the hot phone of the moment. It’s available on more carriers than almost any other phone, and everyone is asking about it. There hasn’t been this much excitement over a device since the iPhone. After using the S3, we think a lot of the hype is warranted. Samsung has delivered a device that meets our expectations in almost every way except in battery life, and surprised us with innovative and quirky new software features. We don’t know what the next iPhone will bring, but it’s good to see an Android phone gain so much momentum. There’s a lot to love about the Galaxy S3.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 19, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

www.whathifi.com‘s review Edit

Believe the hype, the Galaxy S III is the flagship smartphone that they all have to beat
10.0 Rated at:

 
Was this review helpful? Yes No

www.computeractive.co.uk‘s review Edit

While the all-plastic case may lack the appeal of other Android 4 phones, the Samsung Galaxy S3 more than makes up for it everywhere else and this is going to be the Android smartphone to beat for some time to come
10.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 19, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

expertreviews‘s review Edit

Fast, with an amazing screen and great battery life; Android handsets don’t get better than this
10.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 07, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

PC Pro‘s review Edit

A superb screen and camera, plus a host of software extras means it’s a gold star for Samsung once again, notwithstanding the less-than stellar design
10.0 Rated at:

Published on:
Jun 01, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

Currently, it's obvious that the Galaxy S III has an upper hand in this fight, because of the fact that it's running Ice Cream Sandwich. This allows it to have a more fluid, faster and overall more polished performance compared to the Xperia S. This is not only true for the UI, but for many of the core apps, like the browser, as well. Meanwhile, the Xperia S has a better camera (as far as photos go), as well as a competitive specs sheet, but it will take a good ICS update for it to be able to compete on the same level as the Galaxy S III.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 30, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

SlashGear‘s review Edit

No, this isn’t the epiphany in metal, ceramic and glass we were hoping for from Samsung, but if the company had to compromise in some places on the Galaxy S III, we’d rather accept a somewhat plasticky handset with the incredible performance, brilliant screen and great camera than a nicely-dressed dog. We try not to read too much into raw benchmarking, but the day to day experience of the Galaxy S III suggests this is one of the best performing, most usable Android devices around, if not the best.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 27, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

In our opinion, the Samsung Galaxy S III is the better phone, due to its improved software and better specs (especially the quad-core processor). If you're getting one of these two now, we'd recommend that you side with the Galaxy Note, only in case you're watching lots and lots of video on the phone. In any other case, the Galaxy S III is the better and more future-proof choice. Plus, watching video on the 4.8” display is also a great experience!
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 28, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Pocket-lint‘s review Edit

There is a lot to love about the Samsung Galaxy S III. As a premium flagship smartphone it has plenty going for it. The huge display, the power, the smooth and fast operation are all to its credit. Add to this the ability to change battery and expand storage and you've a very good package indeed. Of course there are always areas that we might want an improvement: the display could be brighter for example, which is our biggest real gripe. We found some bugs with screen unlock and the Smart Stay feature designed to keep the screen on when reading never really worked for us. In some areas, Samsung's user interface looks a little cartoony, but at the same time, when set it against the biggest rival, the HTC One X, there are things on both sides we'd change. Some of these are easy, because the Android app space is now matured and third party options for things like media servers or keyboards are easy to come by. The Samsung Galaxy S III will undoubtedly do well and it deserves to: it's a fantastic phone. Android users should be smug: you have choices and whichever way your personal preference leads you, you'll get an excellent handset at the end of it.
9.0 Rated at:

Published on:
May 28, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

Well, it appears that the Samsung Galaxy S III has proved to be the better device in most of the categories we covered. Riding on the wings of its superior hardware, the GS III presents the user with an overall experience that's bit more refined. Unless you are crazy about the stock UI of the ICS platform and the particular styling of the Nexus itself, there really isn't too much reason to side with it, as the Galaxy S III will remain relevant for a longer time. Interestingly, though, if you happen to be sporting a Galaxy Nexus right now, we can't really find too much reason for you to upgrade to the GS III, as the difference between the two handsets isn't anything drastic.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 21, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

As we stated in the beginning, this is one of those fights which could last for an eternity, because each of the opponents is the best in its own way. However, as we break things down, it should become clear to you which way you want to go. There shouldn't be any doubt that the iPhone 4S is the better-designed handset. With striking visuals and premium written all over it, this is a phone that you won't be embarrassed to put on the table. Quite the contrary, you might want to put it there, as it has turned into a status symbol. The design of the Galaxy S III, on the other hand, caters to the needs of the hardcore crowd, thanks to its large display that makes enjoying multimedia that much more fun.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 18, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

Well, folks, it should have become clear by now that the Galaxy S III will once again rule the land of Android, at least until a better contender arrives on the scene. For now, however, the powerful HTC One X isn't capable enough to question its leadership. Although HTC's offering is arguably better when it comes to appearance and overall design, the Galaxy S III is unbeatable as far as user experience goes and that's what's more important. Why would you need a good-looking phone that takes mediocre images and video, and has a number of nasty issues in its software? Meanwhile, the Galaxy S III may not be the most beautiful phone ever, but it does everything right in terms of functionality, meaning it will cause you far less trouble during day-to-day usage.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 16, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

To sum it all up, there are a number of reasons why upgrading to the Galaxy S III would be good for you. The most important one is the bigger, higher-resolution screen, which will make consumption of multimedia that much more enjoyable. The other reason is the quad-core Exynos processor, which is basically future-proof right now. Although the dual-core CPU found on the GS II is still pretty good, with these quad-core SoCs around, it might soon find itself lacking enough power to provide smooth performance with heavier apps and games. The third reason is the refined software on the GS III, in the form of TouchWiz Nature UX. The new UI looks and runs better, while adding a few cool features to further enhance your experience of using the phone. Still, with the Galaxy S II running Ice Cream Sandwich, and with many third-party launchers being available on Google Play, GS II users aren't really missing too much in this respect. If you can live without those features, well, we guess you can stick to your trusty Galaxy S II for a little longer, until even more capable smartphones start showing up. However, if the Galaxy S III turns out to be as successful as its predecessor, we have the feeling that you might have to wait quite a bit until something better arrives on the scene.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 17, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Phone Arena‘s review Edit

The Samsung Galaxy S III is a spectacular phone. A big part of what makes it spectacular is its incredible specs sheet. Yeah, although its specs can easily be rivaled by strong competitors like the HTC One X, which also has a quad-core processor and the other beloved tech goodies, the Galaxy S III manages to shine brighter, thanks to its superior user experience. It doesn't falter as far as core functionality goes, and it even takes care of the minor stuff, trying to improve every possible aspect of your usage. For a first time ever, TouchWiz actually feels like a good thing. It doesn't completely cover up the great ICS UI, but changes it just enough to make the phone feel different from the stock experience. It adds a lot of nice touches here and there, providing you with more options and customization, without appearing cluttered. We absolutely loved the fact that Samsung has left little hints at some places, which definitely help make the learning curve a lot smoother. Well, the device is bulky. You'll definitely have to forget about the comfort of using it with one hand only. But that's the way it is with this new breed of Android superphones. If you want to have a giant touchscreen, then you'll have to put up with having a giant phone.
9.3 Rated at:

Published on:
May 15, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

LAPTOP Magazine‘s review Edit

On the surface, the Galaxy S III doesn’t look like Samsung has evolved its flagship that much. But once you start using the device, you discover a host of features that add up to the smartest phone the company has ever created and certainly the most intelligent Android handset yet. While some will always prefer a pure Android 4.0 experience like the Galaxy Nexus, little things like having a news ticker option on the lock screen make this device feel more dynamic than the competition. From the gestures and sharing features to the improved voice recognition, the Galaxy S III has the makings of a huge hit. But we’ll have to wait to get our hands on the U.S. version to definitively say just how well the device performs and how much Samsung has moved this category forward.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 09, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

AnandTech‘s review Edit

I have to be totally honest - when I saw the SGS3 design for the first time, my initial reactions were somewhat cool. The device's design is an obvious evolution of the Qualcomm-based DC-HSPA+ or LTE SGS2s such as the T-Mobile SGS2, not the radical, over-hyped, under-substantiated (and perhaps unrealistic) unibody ceramic or other magicmaterial that everyone wanted. It's the same effect we saw with the iPhone 4S - rumors build to a fever pitch, everyone keeps adding more things to the wish list, and then reality hits home when the curtain lifts. Everyone wants the impossible, but only years of manufacturing process improvement and scale brings that closer. That said, I think HTC has clearly won the industrial design and in-hand feel category this time around. The obvious comparison point is the HTC One X (Tegra 3). When I compare the two side by side, the differentiation really comes down to display, and camera. The One X LCD is beautiful, and the One X/S camera is a very good performer. Subjective UI snappiness between the two are actually very close even though the SGS3's Exynos 4 Quad clearly holds an advantage over Tegra 3, but it ends up being accessories rather than core which will define the better device.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 03, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

CNET Reviews‘s review Edit

The Samsung Galaxy S III's plastic build may not be to everyone's liking, but the quad-core processor and improved voice control feature show that Samsung's flagship Android line has staying power.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 03, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

TechRadar UK‘s review Edit

The Samsung Galaxy S3 has got all the hallmarks of the best Android phone yet – exactly what Samsung wanted to achieve. The specs are all industry leading: 4.8-inch Super AMOLED+ HD screen, NFC, Bluetooth 4.0, 64GB internal memory, eye tracking and so much more. The design may be lightweight but is certainly iconic, and the feel in the palm and pocket is impressive. Samsung's decision to focus on services and interaction as much as design will be the area that makes or breaks the Galaxy S3 – if they all work as intended, the rest of the competition will really have to work to catch up. However, if the likes of Smart Stay or S Voice don't live up to expectations, this is still a cracking phone – it's the Samsung Galaxy Nexus on steroids and covered with Samsung's own overlay, which will divide opinion for Android lovers. But we're really excited about this phone – following up the Galaxy S2 was always going to be a difficult task, but with the S3 we've definitely got a phone that could be worthy of that crown.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 03, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

SlashGear‘s review Edit

So, incremental upgrade or the revolution many have been hoping for? The rumor-mill has been running in overdrive in the months, weeks and days up to this phone, and to some extent Samsung couldn’t hope to compete with what many desired from the Galaxy S III. Even so, from an early play it’s clear that the rough edges that had become apparent on the GSII – its WVGA resolution, somewhat clumsy aesthetic and childish UI – have been successfully removed in the new handset. Yes, the plastic casing may not feel quite as premium as an iPhone or One X, but it’s a handsome phone in both white and blue, and doesn’t feel as cheap as its predecessor.
n/a Not rated

Published on:
May 03, 2012
Was this review helpful? Yes No

The average pro reviews rating is 9.0 / 10, based on the 64 reviews.


How we do it

We humanly agregate professional reviews from a number of high quality sites. This way, we are giving you a quick way to see the average rating and save you the need to search the reviews on your own. You want to share a professional review you like?


POPULAR COMPARISONS

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Apple iPhone X vs

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Apple iPhone X

Nikon D850 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV vs

Nikon D850 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Apple iPad 9.7-inch (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 vs

Apple iPad 9.7-inch (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S3

Apple MacBook Air (13-in, 2017) vs Google Pixelbook vs

Apple MacBook Air (13-in, 2017) vs Google Pixelbook

Highly rated gadgets

Latest user reviews

Last of its kind

8.5 / 10

Created by Sorgo in Samsung Galaxy S Relay 4G

LG BD550 Blu-Ray Player

8.9 / 10

Created by Huntnsouls in LG BD550

Roccat Isku

8.3 / 10

Created by Huntnsouls in Roccat Isku

Copyright © 2010-24 Meet Gadget. All rights reserved.

Site features

About us

Affiliates: